Have you ever heard someone talk about “copping a plea” and wondered what it meant? It’s a common legal term, but one that can leave those without a legal background scratching their heads.
In law, copping a plea refers to the act of pleading guilty in exchange for a reduced sentence or other agreement with the prosecution. It’s a way of trying to get a better outcome than a full trial would bring, and it’s often used when a defendant thinks there’s a risk of conviction if it goes to court.
The Pros and Cons of Copping a Plea
In many circumstances, copping a plea can be an attractive option – it allows the defendant to avoid the time and expense of a full trial, and may also end up with a less severe penalty. As an example, real estate magnate and former president Donald Trump recently copped a plea in a case where he faced criminal fraud and tax evasion charges.
The downside to copping a plea, however, is that a guilty plea typically means the defendant gives up any chance of exoneration or appeal. In the case of Trump, his plea meant he was responsible for the $2 million in fines and penalties – and while it was certainly a better outcome than a criminal conviction, it was also an expensive one.
The Bottom Line
It’s important to understand the implications of copping a plea when faced with criminal charges. Be sure to consult with knowledgeable legal counsel before making any decisions –while copping a plea can sometimes be the best option, it can also be risky.