Admission against interest is a legal term that refers to any statement made voluntarily by a party that is contrary to their own interests. This type of admission may be used in a court of law against the person who made it as evidence that a fact is more likely to be true. This rule is based on the idea that a person would more likely than not tell the truth if it is against their own best interests.
What Does an Admission Against Interest Look Like in Practice?
An example of an admission against interest could be a witness in a court case admitting to a crime they committed or a litigant acknowledging that their opponent’s version of events is true. It could also be as simple as a defendant in a civil case agreeing to pay a sum of money to settle the dispute. In either case, the admission can be used by the other party as evidence of the truth in the matter.
How Do Admissions Against Interest Differ From Other Types of Evidence?
Admissions against interest are often more reliable than other forms of evidence such as circumstantial evidence or hearsay. This is because, in the case of an admission against interest, the person making the admission has a vested interest in avoiding that admission. Therefore, the person is more likely to be telling the truth, because it is against their best interests. In the eyes of a court, this can make an admission against interest more credible than other types of evidence.
The Bottom Line on Admissions Against Interest
Admission against interest is an important legal concept that enables parties in a dispute to provide evidence of truth in a court of law. In a nutshell, an admission against interest is any voluntary statement made by a party that is against their own interests. This type of admission is more credible than other forms of evidence, as it can be assumed that a person would not be likely to make an admission that is against their own interests unless it were true.