The infamous “Twinkie defense” has been a part of legal parlance for decades, but do you know what it means? The term Twinkie defense refers to a legal strategy used by a defendant to use an irrational or bizarre excuse in order to explain away their culpability in a crime. The term was first coined in 1979, when defense attorney Dan White used it as part of his defense in the case of the murder of San Francisco mayor George Moscone and city supervisor Harvey Milk.
At the time, White claimed his judgment was impaired by his poor diet of sugary junk food such as Twinkies, leading to his mental state at the time of the crime being the deciding factor in his defense. While this was widely seen as an attempt to get away with murder, the strategy worked, and White was declared not guilty of premeditated murder yet convicted of voluntary manslaughter instead.
Since then, the term Twinkie defense has come to mean any legal strategy where the excuse presented is so far-fetched that it’s deemed to be implausible. This type of defense is regularly used by defendants who are trying to downplay their role in the criminal act. For example, if a defendant were to say that they only committed the crime because they had a momentary lapse of judgment brought on by an irrational fear, the court might reject the defense as being too implausible.
In modern legal cases, the Twinkie defense is often used as a last-ditch effort to break away from culpability, however, more and more courts are recognizing that mental health issues can contribute to an irrational state of mind, and are thus allowing such defenses to be taken into account.
The Takeaway
The Twinkie defense is a legal strategy that has been around for decades and refers to using a bizarre or irrational excuse to explain away a crime. Originally coined in defense of the murder of San Francisco mayor George Moscone and city supervisor Harvey Milk, the Twinkie defense has become synonymous with defendants who are downplaying their role in the criminal act. Recent developments in the legal system have come to recognize mental health issues as an acceptable contributing factor in criminal cases, so this defense may be on the rise.