Continuance is an important legal term used in court proceedings and may seem unfamiliar to the non-lawyer. A continuance is essentially an act of the court to continue or postpone a court hearing or trial to a future date. This is often done to allow the parties involved more time for preparation or to give them the opportunity to reach a settlement. It is also granted when a key witness is not available for the hearing.
The act of seeking a continuance is common in court proceedings and is not considered to be a judgment or opinion on the case. The lawyers representing the parties can usually agree on a continuance without having to go to court for a ruling. The court will usually grant continuances as long as they are reasonable. For instance, if someone needs to attend a medical appointment or a funeral, this could warrant a continuance.
Modern Examples of Continuances
A great example of a continuance in action is the case of United States v. Arpaio in 2017. In this case, Sheriff Joe Arpaio requested a continuance in order to gather more evidence for his defense. The request was denied by the federal judge presiding over the trial.
The same year, police were searching for a suspect wanted for aggravated assault and weapons charges. The suspect’s attorney requested a continuance to allow for more time to collect evidence, which the court granted.
Understanding the Value of a Continuance
It is important to understand that the court will only grant a continuance if it is warranted. The request should be reasonable and not intended to prolong a trial beyond its necessary length. A continuance is an important tool for both sides to prepare for a trial or to attempt to reach an agreement before trial commences.
Continuance is an important legal term that allows for reasonable delays in court proceedings in order to enable parties to prepare for a trial or reach a settlement. Although the court may deny a request for a continuance if it is deemed to be unreasonable, a properly argued request for a continuance can make a big difference in the outcome of a case.