When we hear the phrase “emergency doctrine,” it can evoke feelings of uncertainty and apprehension. What exactly does the emergency doctrine entail? How does it affect our businesses? Here, we will dive deeper into the associated legal concepts to better understand this critical doctrine.
What Is the Emergency Doctrine?
At its most basic level, the emergency doctrine allows for a government to take immediate action to protect its citizens during a public emergency. It is based loosely on an English common law doctrine that permits public officials to take initiatives when facing crises that threaten public health, safety, and welfare. Such an emergency doctrine is also found in many state constitutions.
The emergency doctrine usually hinges on the idea of immediacy. In the heat of a crisis, if a government is unable to follow its standard processes or policies, they may be allowed to take a more direct approach. Such actions, however, must meet reasonable standards of fairness and due process.
Examples of Emergency Doctrine
Recent years have seen several examples of the emergency doctrine in action. In 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, there was a sharp need for government intervention. To ensure the safety of citizens, state and federal governments put several measures in place, such as shelter-in-place orders, business closures, and travel restrictions. This was done in line with the emergency doctrine.
In 2004, shortly after the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government implemented the U.S. Patriot Act. This act was passed to help law enforcement agencies monitor and prevent future terrorist attacks. It allowed the government to access records and gain access to private conversations, allowing for better surveillance of potential threats.
Conclusion
Though there are many questions and implications surrounding the emergency doctrine, the overarching purpose is clear: To protect society. Of course, the implementation of the emergency doctrine is not without risk. Governments are often granted significant powers during public health emergencies, which can have long-term implications on citizens’ civil liberties. Thus, it is essential for governments to act responsibly and ensure that their proactive measures are driven by true necessity.