In the world of legal representation, “in pro per” is often used to describe a situation in which a party chooses to represent themselves. Not to be confused with “promptly,” “in pro per” literally means “for (him|her)self.”
It is not exactly recommended as strategy for engaging in any type of legal dispute. Nevertheless, individuals have the right to self-represent themselves during court proceedings or when drafting legal documents. It is also known by other terms such as ‘pro se’ and ‘in propria persona.’
When one acts “in pro per” they are essentially their own lawyer. As such, the individual must be aware of the relevant legal rules and procedures or they risk seriously jeopardising their case and any potential outcome. To do this they must often become well versed in the legal system, the applicable laws and the court process.
Additionally, “in pro per” primarily refers to civil proceedings. This means that it is not typically used to refer to individuals who are accused of a crime and must go to criminal proceedings. In criminal cases, those individuals are referred to as not having counsel or as “pro se litigants.”
What Does This Mean for Modern Litigants?
Today, more litigants are representing themselves than ever before – whether by choice or out of necessity. Despite having the right to do so, ‘in pro per’ always carries a certain level of risk for both the individual and the court. Litigants self-representing often lack the skills and knowledge needed to navigate the nuances of the legal system and, thereby, put their case and outcome at risk.
As such, the court will often need to take additional steps to ensure that the litigant clearly understands all of their rights and responsibilities in the proceedings. This can lead to added complexity, paperwork and cost.
When considering the issue of “in pro per” litigants must always remember that it could be more difficult, costly and time consuming than having a professional lawyer represent them.