What Does Argument Mean? Exploring the Different Types of Arguments

When it comes to legal proceedings, understanding the different types of arguments can be an invaluable tool. In jurisprudence, an argument is a statement that is intended to persuade someone to accept a certain point of view. Arguments can take many forms and come from many different sources, including from an individual or from experts in a given field.

The Basics of an Argument

At its core, an argument follows a certain structure. It has a claim, which is the statement that is being presented. Then, there is evidence which provides proof to the claim. Finally, the conclusion is the expected outcome from the claim.

Evidence-Based Argument

An argument can be evidence-based, meaning it has evidence to support its claim. In an evidence-based argument, the evidence used should be reliable and verifiable. For example, if the claim is that the minimum wage should be raised, the evidence could include statistics, economic studies, and data on the costs of living.

Want to explore this concept further? Ask Legalpedia AI — get a plain-English explanation instantly, free.

Philosophical Argument

Philosophical arguments use logical reasoning to draw conclusions. They don’t necessarily need evidence to support their claims but must prove that the logic used is valid and can be applied to other situations. For example, if the claim is that freedom is essential for a fair society, the argument could use logical principles to prove the claim.

What Arguments Can Do

Arguments can be used in a variety of ways, including to persuade, to explain, or to inform. Whether in a legal context or in a more general understanding, arguments can be a powerful tool. They can help us to understand and evaluate issues, and ultimately, to make better decisions.

Related Legal Concepts

Understanding arguments in legal practice often involves mastering specific techniques like the golden rule argument, which asks jurors to put themselves in the plaintiff’s position. Arguments reach their culmination in the closing argument phase of trial, where attorneys synthesize all evidence and testimony into their most persuasive presentation to the jury or judge.

The Bottom Line

Arguments form the backbone of legal advocacy, requiring attorneys to craft persuasive presentations that combine factual evidence with logical reasoning. Whether evidence-based or philosophical in nature, effective legal arguments must follow a clear structure of claim, evidence, and conclusion to successfully persuade courts and juries. For guidance specific to your situation, always consult a qualified, licensed attorney.