Not guilty by reason of insanity is a legal defense recognized in some jurisdictions in the United States. It is also referred to as insanity defense or mental disorder defense. The defense is used when an individual is held accountable for a criminal act, and found to have been in a state of mental illness that did not allow them to distinguish between what is right and what is wrong at the time of the crime.
When a person is found not guilty by reason of insanity, it does not mean that the charges are dismissed. It essentially means that the defendant has been excused from criminal responsibility, largely due to mental illness or impairments to their reasoning. However, this does not mean that the person is able to be released from custody, as they must be sent to a mental health facility for further evaluation and treatment until they are deemed fit for release.
History of Insanity Defense
The insanity defense can be traced all the way back to English common law in the mid-19th century. The basic notion of this defense is that the defendant, at the time of the criminal act, could not comprehend the difference between what is right and wrong due to an existing mental illness or mental disorder.
The infamous John Hinckley Jr., who attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan in 1981, was found not guilty by reason of insanity. His defense attorney proved that due to a mental illness, Hinckley Jr. could not understand the consequences of his actions at the time of the crime.
Criticisms of Insanity Defense
The use of the insanity defense has been met with criticism from prosecutors and law enforcement as many people believe that it is too lenient treatment for accused criminals. Some also believe that this defense is being overused in courtrooms, with criminals trying to manipulate the system to avoid punishment.
Despite this, the defense still remains in effect and is regularly used in many jurisdictions across the United States.