What Does ‘Remainder Subject to a Condition Precedent’ Mean?

The phrase “remainder subject to a condition precedent” is a legal concept that requires one party to fulfill a condition or promise before the other party is obligated to perform a contract. This concept applies to any form of contract or agreement, as it gives the final party assurance that they will receive the remainder of what was promised if the other party has fulfilled their condition.

Condition Precedent in Contract Law

In contract law, a “condition precedent” is a specific event or action that must occur in order for the contact to be legally binding. For example, a contract may not be binding if one party fails to make a payment on time. This type of condition must be met before the contract can be enforced and the other party is legally obligated to fulfill their promise.

Examples of Condition Precedent

A common example of a condition precedent is a lease agreement. The tenant must pay the agreed-upon rent in full each month as a condition precedent. If the tenant fails to fulfill this condition on time, the landlord may not be obligated to honor the remainder of the lease agreement.

Another example is an employment contract. If an employee fails to complete certain tasks or fails to maintain a certain level of performance, the employer may not be obligated to provide the promised salary or benefits.

What ‘Remainder Subject to a Condition Precedent’ Means

Put simply, “remainder subject to a condition precedent” means that a party must fulfil a certain condition before another party is obligated to fulfill their promise. This type of legal concept is applicable to any type of contract or agreement, giving assurance to the final party that they will receive the remainder of what was promised as long as the other party has fulfilled their condition.