A plea in abatement is a legal term used to describe a defense pleading or motion that challenges the court’s jurisdiction over a case. A plea in abatement can be used by either the prosecution or the defense in a criminal case, or by the plaintiff or defendant in a civil case. It is typically filed at the beginning of the legal process.
A plea in abatement can be based on many grounds, such as the wrong parties being named in the action, the court lacking proper jurisdiction over the matter, or a statute of limitations having expired. The plea in abatement can be used to address procedural defects in the case which provide the challenger with a valid defense–it can also be used to take advantage of loopholes in the law.
Plea in Abatement Examples in Modern Times
An example of a plea in abatement can be seen in the 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case Burgh v. Hughes. The defendant in the case, Chester Hughes, was accused of illegally transferring money in 2001. He filed a plea in abatement, arguing that the court did not have jurisdiction because the criminal charges were brought six years too late under the applicable statute of limitations.
In 2018, Willie Simmons, a long-term death row inmate in Georgia, appealed his conviction and sentence, arguing that the prosecution had committed misconduct during the trial and the judge had failed to instruct the jury correctly. He filed a plea in abatement, seeking to challenge the court’s jurisdiction over the case and avoid execution.
Conclusion
A plea in abatement is a powerful legal tool which can be used to challenge the court’s authority to hear a case or to address procedural issues. It is often used in criminal and civil matters, and can be an effective defense strategy if used correctly. Modern examples of plea in abatement include the cases of Burgh v. Hughes and Willie Simmons.