Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) is a legal term referring to a judge’s authority to set aside the jury’s decision and enter a judgment contrary to the jury’s verdict. This means that a judge can essentially substitute their own judgment for that of the jury.
The judge will enter JNOV in the case when they believe that a jury has wrongly decided the case in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant. The judge may also enter JNOV when the jury has not provided a legally valid verdict, such as when the jury did not answer all the questions presented in the case. The judge may or may not give a written opinion explaining their decision.
Modern Examples of JNOV
An example of JNOV happened in April 2020. In a California wrongful death case, a jury awarded a large sum to the surviving family members of the deceased. But shortly after, the judge entered JNOV. The judge said that the jury had incorrectly applied the wrongful death statutes, and so she entered her own judgment overturning the jury’s decision.
In another recent JNOV case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit entered JNOV in a civil rights case, wherein a jury had found that a certain police officer had actually used excessive force when making an arrest. The judge found that the jury’s decision was not supported by the evidence, and so he entered JNOV.
JNOV in the Legal System
Judgment notwithstanding the verdict is an important legal principle and situation that can occur in any court case. In most jurisdictions, it is the judge’s prerogative to enter JNOV when they deem it necessary.
The purpose of entering JNOV is to protect the public and ensure that only lawful verdicts are given in court cases. This helps to ensure that people’s legal rights are not violated, and that only verdicts based on the evidence presented are given.
JNOV is a legal term that all business professionals should be aware of. It is an important principle that can play a crucial role in determining the outcome of a trial.