In family law, “no-fault divorce” is a simplified procedure which allows married couples to end their marriage without either party having to prove fault or wrongdoing on the part of the other. This is different from other divorce proceedings which require one party to cite a cause for the divorce, such as abandonment or adultery, and must provide evidence of such activities in order to break the marriage.
The History of No-Fault Divorce
No-fault divorce law was created in 1969 with the first no-fault divorce law passed in California. While all states now have some form of no-fault divorce, there are still a few states that make it difficult to obtain a no-fault divorce. Currently, it is easier to obtain a no-fault divorce than to obtain a fault-based divorce because of the burden of proof required in a fault-based divorce.
Pros and Cons of No-Fault Divorce
No-fault divorce has both advantages and disadvantages. Proponents of no-fault divorce argue that it is a more amicable option than a fault-based divorce. This ensures that the marriage is ended without blame, enabling both parties to move on without increasing acrimony. Opponents of no-fault divorce argue that it makes the divorce process too easy, leading to frivolous filings and inadequate child support payments.
Real-World Applications of No-Fault Divorce
No-fault divorce is becoming increasingly common in the United States, with several states now allowing for a separation of the parties for a specified period of time, even when no fault is asserted. While some states still require a minimum number of months between spouses before such a separation may be granted, most jurisdictions allow the parties to enter a no-fault divorce within a few months or a year. This means that even couples with deep differences can divorce without needing to prove fault in court in order to do so.