No matter how much attention Congress and the President pay to a bill, care should be taken to ensure that any laws being passed are fair and equitable. This is where signing statements come in. A signing statement is a document issued by the President when he or she signs a bill into law that expresses his or her views about the bill\u2019s constitutionality or interpretation.<\/p>\n
Historically, Presidents from both parties have used the signing statement tool to further their presidential powers by declaring certain sections of a bill to be \u201cadvisory\u201d or inapplicable to certain executive branch activities. Signing statements are seen as a check on the power of Congress and the President to properly interpret legislation, especially when complex policy issues are involved. As such, they are of great importance in today\u2019s legal landscape.<\/p>\n
One of the most famous examples of a signing statement concerns the Military Commissions Act of 2006<\/a>. President George W. Bush issued a signing statement in which he raised the possibility that government officials could \u201cin certain circumstances\u201d override sections of the law and still comply with his understanding of laws regulating the detention, interrogation<\/a>, and prosecution<\/a> of suspected terrorists.<\/p>\n Want to explore this concept further? Ask Legalpedia AI<\/a> \u2014 get a plain-English explanation instantly, free.<\/em><\/p>\n More recently, in 2018, President Donald Trump issued a signing statement for the massive budget bill he signed into law. The statement declared that he would \u201clook for every opportunity to conduct himself in accordance with the Constitution<\/a>\u2019s Article Two requirements, including the presidential responsibility to withhold funds from inappropriate uses.\u201d In doing so, Trump declared that he did not have to necessarily abide by certain sections of the bill if he determined them to be contrary to the Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n Presidential signing statements represent a unique form of executive interpretation that differs from other legal documents like registration statements or agreed statements of facts used in litigation. While an opening statement<\/a> in court presents an attorney’s interpretation of evidence to come, signing statements allow presidents to offer their constitutional interpretation of legislation they’re enacting. Understanding the broader category of Presidential signing statements<\/a> helps contextualize how these tools have evolved as instruments of executive power and constitutional interpretation.<\/p>\n Signing statements serve as the President’s formal declaration<\/a> of how they interpret new legislation, often highlighting constitutional concerns or implementation priorities. These documents reveal the ongoing tension between executive and legislative branches over the scope of presidential power and statutory interpretation. For guidance specific to your situation, always consult a qualified, licensed attorney.<\/p>\nRelated Legal Concepts<\/h2>\n
The Bottom Line<\/h2>\n